![]() ![]() The reasons for using a two-tailed test is that even though the experimenters expect cloud seeding to increase rainfall, it is possible that the reverse occurs and, in fact, a significant decrease in rainfall results. Here the null and alternative hypotheses are as follows. For the cloud seeding example, it is more common to use a two-tailed test. Two-tailed hypothesis testing doesn’t specify a direction of the test. average rain decreases after cloud seeding)įigure 2 – Critical region is the left tail average rainfall does not decrease after cloud seeding) Then the null hypothesis could be as follows: For example, suppose the cloud seeding is expected to decrease rainfall. It is quite possible to have one sided tests where the critical value is the left (or lower) tail. ![]() The critical value here is the right (or upper) tail. the test statistic has a value larger than the critical value.įigure 1 – Critical region is the right tail The null hypothesis is rejected only if the test statistic falls in the critical region, i.e. Here the experimenters are quite sure that the cloud seeding will not significantly reduce rainfall, and so a one-tailed test is used where the critical region is as in the shaded area in Figure 1. average rainfall increases after cloud seeding P-value (the probability value) is the value p of the statistic used to test the null hypothesis. we are willing to accept the fact that in 1 out of every 20 samples we reject the null hypothesis even though it is true. This means that we are willing to tolerate up to 5% of type I errors, i.e. 05 is used (although sometimes other levels such as α =. Significance level is the acceptable level of type I error, denoted α. The acceptable level of a Type I error is designated by alpha ( α), while the acceptable level of a Type II error is designated beta ( β). Type II – H 0 is not rejected even though it is false ( false negative).Type I – H 0 is rejected even though it is true ( false positive).When performing such tests, there is some chance that we will reach the wrong conclusion. ![]() Often in an experiment we are actually testing the validity of the alternative hypothesis by testing whether to reject the null hypothesis. We therefore speak about rejecting or not rejecting (aka retaining) the null hypothesis on the basis of some test, but not of accepting the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. We can merely gather information (via statistical tests) to determine whether it is likely or not. Since our sample usually only contains a subset of the data in the population, we cannot be absolutely certain as to whether the null hypothesis is true or not. H 0 is true if and only if H 1 is false), it is sufficient to define the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is typically abbreviated as H 0 and the alternative hypothesis as H 1. The complement of the null hypothesis is called the alternative hypothesis. Thus, the null hypothesis is true if the observed data (in the sample) do not differ from what would be expected on the basis of chance alone. The hypothesis that the estimate is based solely on chance is called the null hypothesis. By using the appropriate statistical test we then determine whether this estimate is based solely on chance. This is done by choosing an estimator function for the characteristic (of the population) we want to study and then applying this function to the sample to obtain an estimate. We then determine whether any conclusions we reach about the sample are representative of the population. Generally to understand some characteristic of the general population we take a random sample and study the corresponding property of the sample.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |